“In the EY survey, 63% of employees said they avoid leadership roles because they fear managing AI-augmented teams. The future of work is not a skills gap. It is an emotional gap.”
This report is a direct, quantitative corroboration of our entire argument in the new book we're working on, Human 2.0: Why the Next Revolution Is Human.
Our book argues that:
This EY report provides direct statistical evidence for each of these claims.
Here are some examples:
1. Workers are emotionally unstable in the presence of AI
Our language: “Meaning thins before work changes.”
EY’s data:
This is precisely consistent with our concept of identity dissonance.
2. Managers have no idea how to lead hybrid human–AI teams
Our claim: “The new (ai-influenced) collapse is behavioral, interpretive, emotional.”
EY’s data:
This is essentially our thesis when we introduce the concept of The Governors of Intelligence and discuss Leadership in the Age of Acceleration.
3. Emotional infrastructure is missing — completely
Our claim: “Organizations are not engines of efficiency; they are engines of meaning.”
EY’s finding:
This is textbook Heartware™ failure, a term we introduce in our book.
4. Culture is the determinant — not the tech
Our claim: “Tools accelerate; culture interprets.”
EY’s conclusion:
This quantifies what we describe as the Architecture of Coherence.
You can find a copy of the study here.